Skip to main content
Tag

Healthcare

Senate GOPers Demanded CBO Score, Until Now

Time and again, Senate Republicans demanded an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office before they would vote on repealing the Affordable Care Act. This analysis let the Senators know about how much people’s premiums and costs would increase and how many people would lose coverage.

Now, as they rush a partisan, secretly drafted health care repeal bill to a vote, Senate Republicans don’t seem to care. They don’t want to know the truth about how much their constituents’ health care costs will go up or how many will lose coverage. Senator Lindsey Graham put it best himself when he said that a bill without a CBO score “needs to be viewed with suspicion.”

See the history for yourself.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): “Any Bill…Not Scored? Needs To Be Viewed With Suspicion.” “‘Like y’all, I’m still waiting to see if it’s a boy or a girl,’ said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). ‘Any bill that has been posted less than 24 hours, going to be debated three or four hours, not scored? Needs to be viewed with suspicion.’” [Politico, 5/5/17]

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): “We Like The CBO When They Agree With Us…When They Don’t, They’re A Bunch Of Losers.” “Graham, however, argued that his GOP colleagues should spending time reviewing and trying to address the the budget office’s findings. ‘We like the CBO when they agree with us,’ the South Carolina senator told reporters. ‘When they don’t, they’re a bunch of losers.’” [The Hill, 3/13/17]

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) Called For A CBO Score, Wants To See How Many People Lose Coverage, How Much Is Added To The Debt. [Steven Dennis Tweet, 3/6/17]


Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI): Calls For CBO Score As The Starting Point For Debate, “We Need Better Information At The Start Of The Process.” “Johnson said he’s not asking for the discussions to go on for months, but ‘let’s take a couple of weeks and be thoughtful. Give me a chance to make the case to improve it.’ He did say he’ll vote no this week on a measure to move the bill forward, as he believes it’s too early to make that decision. ‘This is such an alternative universe,’ said Johnson. ‘We’ve gotten through the process until we get the CBO score, at the end of the process. We need better information at the start of the process.’” [Newsmax, 6/27/17]

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): “I Think We Need To Do The Job Right, And We Certainly Need A CBO Analysis.” “‘I think we need to do the job right, and we certainly need a CBO analysis,’ she said on Thursday afternoon. ‘Part of the problem is we don’t have a CBO analysis of the impact of the bill, so I don’t know what it is for coverage and cost sharing and the individual insurance markets. There are so many unanswered questions.’” [Vox, 5/4/17]

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): On CBO Not Having A Score In Time For GCHJ, “That’s Problematic.” “Sen. Susan Collins said she is upset that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office won’t have enough time to fully review a last-minute bill to overhaul Obamacare. The Maine Republican has not taken a position on the bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. However, she said she was concerned that CBO said that it won’t be able to determine how the bill would affect insurer coverage and premiums by early next week. ‘That’s problematic because that is part of the problem of short-circuiting the process,’ she told reporters Monday.” [Washington Examiner, 9/18/17]

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL): If Senator Mitch McConnell Does Not Honor Normal Senate Processes And Traditions, “They Won’t Have The Votes In The Senate.” “There was also a creeping concern about how quickly the bill was moving. Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, essentially promised to move the bill to the Senate floor without the hearings and other processes that are normal for such a far-reaching piece of legislation. He had promised when Republicans took the majority that they would honor normal Senate processes and traditions. ‘I think if that’s the approach they take,’ Mr. Rubio said, ‘they won’t have the votes in the Senate.’” [New York Times, 3/8/17]

Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND): “I…Want To See The CBO Score And Additional Analysis Of The Legislation.” “As I’ve said all along, our overall goal for health care reform legislation is to provide Americans with access to patient-centered health care and health insurance at an affordable rate. I did not support the Senate’s first draft. Now, I will review the new draft legislation and want to see the CBO score and additional analysis of the legislation. I will reserve judgment until we do so.” [Sen. Hoeven, Statement, 7/13/17]

Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA): CBO Score “Becomes An Important Part Of The Consideration For The Final Product.” “‘I don’t think it slows it down, but it’s very important,’ Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), a member of the 13-member working group focused on health care, said about the CBO score. ‘It becomes an important part of the consideration for the final product.’” [Morning Consult, 5/10/17]

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX): “The CBO Score On The Senate Bill Is Going To Be What Counts.” “Cornyn: ‘The CBO score on the Senate bill is going to be what counts.’” [Twitter, 5/24/17]

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO): “The Senate’s Going To Have To Have The Kind Of Score They Need To Move This Forward.” “‘The Senate’s going to have to have the kind of score they need to move this forward and the Senate’s going to be looking at this to see what we can do to take the House work, look at what the House did, look at what we can do to improve that in our view,’ Blunt told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” [The Hill, 5/7/17]

Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ): “We’ll See When CBO Comes Back How That Scores…” “On the other side, Flake views the bill’s refundable tax credits as more taxpayer subsidies. ‘We’ll see when CBO comes back how that scores, but it’s still pretty expensive,’ Flake said, referring to the pending cost and coverage estimates by the Congressional Budget Office.” [AZ Central, 3/12/17]

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV): “I Look Forward To Reviewing The Revised Senate Health Care Legislation And Forthcoming CBO Report To Determine The Impact On West Virginians.” “Any health care bill to replace Obamacare must provide access to affordable health care coverage for West Virginians, including our large Medicaid population and those struggling with drug addiction. I opposed the previous draft because it did not ensure access to affordable health care in West Virginia, did not do enough to combat the opioid epidemic that is devastating my state, cut traditional Medicaid too deeply, and harmed rural health care providers. I look forward to reviewing the revised Senate health care legislation and forthcoming CBO report to determine the impact on West Virginians but continue to have serious concerns about the Medicaid provisions.” [Sen. Capito Statement, 7/13/17]

On Health Care Repeal, The Facts Keep Getting Worse

As Republicans continue their partisan push to repeal health care, the damage their repeal would cause turns out to be even worse than the repeal bills they’ve tried in the past.

That probably explains why they refuse to wait for the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimate of how their plan would impact people’s coverage and costs.

  • The Washington Post now reports, “The latest Obamacare overhaul bill gaining steam on Capitol Hill slashes health-care spending more deeply and would likely cover fewer people than a July bill that failed precisely because of such concerns.”
  • Fitch Rating Agency found that this bill was “more disruptive for most states than prior Republican efforts.”
  • New York Republican Representatives Peter King and Tom Reed are doubtful they’ll support the bill, despite voting for earlier health care repeal bills.
  • Republican Governors from Ohio, Massachusetts and New Hampshire have come out against the plan.
  • GOP Senator Rand Paul opposes it, writing in an op-ed, “In all ways, this bill is also ObamaCare Lite. In no way is it repeal the way we promised. I will oppose this bill as I did the other fake repeal bills, and I urge those who want repeal to do so, as well.“

Maybe the GOP should live up to their promise to work across-party-lines and hear from experts to make reforms that improve our health care system instead of this hyper-partisan health care repeal that is overwhelmingly opposed by most Americans.


Partisan Graham-Cassidy Repeal Fails the McCain Test

Washington — Senate Republicans are again pursuing a strategy of secretive, partisan repeal of the health care law despite failing to do so just weeks ago and despite the momentum behind a bipartisan approach to stabilizing insurance markets which has permeated the health care debate in the Senate over the last few weeks.

The current repeal effort being sponsored by U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA), among others, also clearly violates the McCain Test laid out in his floor speech on July 25th where he declared his opposition to partisan repeal based on it failing to meet the traditions and protocols of the United States Senate and for which he received broad acclaim. McCain gave the speech upon returning to the Senate after being diagnosed with brain cancer. Among other things, McCain called for a return to regular order, compromise and bipartisanship and noted that the Republican effort to ram through partisan repeal written in secret and without hearings violated those standards.

“Graham-Cassidy is a return to the very partisan approach and tactics McCain deplored in his speech and fails the McCain Test in every way,” said Protect Our Care Campaign Director Brad Woodhouse. “This repeal bill was written in secret with Republican input only, there have been no hearings on it, there has been no CBO score and there’s not a hint of compromise in the approach which repeals but fails to replace the Affordable Care Act. Graham-Cassidy is a disaster substantively and as it relates to the McCain Test for how the Senate should operate it’s a miserable failure.”

The McCain Test from his July 25th Floor Speech:

· Cooperation

· Compromise

· Common Ground

· Trust

· Working Together

· Regular Order

· Committee Process

· Bipartisanship

· Deliberative

The McCain Test reiterated yesterday on Face the Nation:

MCCAIN: “Are we going to ram through our proposal with, with Democrats and the president? That’s not the way to do it. We got to go back. If I could just say again, the way to do this is have a bill, put it through the committee. We have Patty Murray and Lamar Alexander are doing fine — bring it to the floor. Have debate. Have amendments.”

Graham-Cassidy Fails the McCain Test:

· Partisan

· Secret

· No Hearings

· Rushed


McCain and Kasich Rebuke Partisan Health Care Repeal with No Committee Hearings

On CBS’s Face the Nation this weekend, Senator John McCain reiterated his belief that any health care repeal needs bipartisan input and public hearings, as opposed to the secret, closed, partisan process currently driving the Graham-Cassidy health care repeal.

In response to McCain’s statement, Ohio Governor John Kasich agreed.


Here’s McCain’s full quote from Face the Nation:

MCCAIN: “Are we going to ram through our proposal with, with Democrats and the president? That’s not the way to do it. We got to go back. If I could just say again, the way to do this is have a bill, put it through the committee. We have Patty Murray and Lamar Alexander are doing fine — bring it to the floor. Have debate. Have amendments.”


Protect Our Care Statement on Introduction of Graham-Cassidy-Heller

Washington, D.C. — Today, GOP Senators Lindsey Graham, Bill Cassidy, Dean Heller and Ron Johnson introduced yet another bill to repeal the health care of the American people that would slash coverage, raise costs, eliminate protections and gut Medicaid. This desperate bill comes after three failed Senate repeal votes and a declaration from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that “it is time to move on,” and amidst the bipartisan hearings more than a dozen GOP senators have called for. The renewed partisan effort to repeal health care threatens the bipartisan efforts that began in earnest last week. In response to the GOP’s attempt to revive the least-popular piece of legislation in three decades, Protect Our Care Campaign Director Brad Woodhouse issued the following statement:

“Time and again, the American people have made explicitly clear that they do not want partisan health care repeal. The Graham-Cassidy-Heller bill is as bad or worse than the GOP’s previous efforts to repeal health care. It contains deep cuts to Medicaid, would eliminate payments to help lower out-of-pocket cost and deductibles and guts protections for people with pre-existing conditions, while disproportionately harming states that expanded Medicaid over those that did not. In short, it’s everything voters of both parties have said they don’t want.

“Attempting to jam a partisan repeal bill through the Senate at the eleventh hour is shameful and unnecessarily puts the bipartisan process underway in jeopardy for no reason. It’s time for Republicans to finally abandon their failed, partisan efforts and follow the lead of Senators Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray to focus on making the bipartisan, common sense fixes necessary to improve health care for millions of people.”

GOP Senators: Health Care Legislation Must Be Bipartisan

In the time since the House passed its partisan health care repeal, the vast majority GOP senators, including Sens. Bill Cassidy, Lindsey Graham and Dean Heller, have consistently called for bipartisan health care legislation. Take a look for yourself…

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) On His Bill With Sen. Graham: “I Think We’ll Have Hearings.” [The Advocate, 9/9/17]

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): “Any Bill…Not Scored? Needs To Be Viewed With Suspicion.” “‘Like y’all, I’m still waiting to see if it’s a boy or a girl,’ said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). ‘Any bill that has been posted less than 24 hours, going to be debated three or four hours, not scored? Needs to be viewed with suspicion.’” [Politico, 5/5/17]

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): “We’re Going To Do All These Things By September 30? Give Me A Break.” “‘We’re going to do all these things by Sept. 30? Give me a break. We’re going to cut taxes, pass health care, set aside sequestration?’ said Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican.” [Politico, 6/2/17]

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): No Deal On Friday Signals “End Of [One-Party] Health Care Talks.” “[Graham] tells [Kasie Hunt] that if GOP doesn’t reach an agreement on health care by Friday it’ll be the end of the 1 party health care talks.” NBC News Frank Thorp Tweet, 6/28/17]

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-TX): “And I Think, Frankly, Bipartisan Solutions Tend To Be More Durable.” “‘There’s a lot the American people expect of us, but we’ve seen with fragile majorities in the Senate that we are forced to work together to try to solve these problems. And I think, frankly, bipartisan solutions tend to be more durable,’ Cornyn said. Democrats have sent Republicans multiple letters on healthcare that asked, for example, for an all-Senate meeting and suggested a list of rooms where they could hold a public hearing.” [The Hill, 8/1/17]

Senate Finance Committee Chair Orrin Hatch (R-UT) On Moving Forward On Health Care: “I Hope It’ll Be Bipartisan.” “‘It’s a constant battle. Health care is one of the most difficult things,’ said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). ‘It has to come back before the end of the year. We have to face it.’ Hatch paused when asked if he’s referring to another party-line repeal effort. ‘Oh, I hope it’ll be bipartisan,’ he said.” [Politico, 7/31/17]

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK): “I Have Repeatedly Said That Healthcare Reform, And Especially Major Entitlement Reform, Should Go Through The Committee Process Where Stakeholders Can Weigh In And Ideas Can Be Vetted In A Bipartisan Forum.” “I have repeatedly said that healthcare reform, and especially major entitlement reform, should go through the committee process where stakeholders can weigh in and ideas can be vetted in a bipartisan forum. I voted ‘no’ today to give the Senate another chance to take this to the committee process.” [Murkowski Statement, 7/25/17]

  • Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK): “The Senate Should Step Back And Engage In A Bipartisan Process To Address The Failures Of The ACA And Stabilize The Individual Markets.” “As I’ve been saying, the Senate should take a step back and engage in a bipartisan process to address the failures of the ACA and stabilize the individual markets. That will require members on both sides of the aisle to roll up their sleeves and take this to the open committee process where it belongs.” [Murkowski Statement, 7/18/17]
  • Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK): “This Is Not For Republicans To Fix Or Democrats To Fix — This Is For Us As Americans To Fix.” “‘This is not for Republicans to fix or Democrats to fix — this is for us as Americans to fix,’ Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said.” [MSNBC, 6/27/17]
  • Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK): “We Should Be Working With Our Colleagues On The Other Side Of The Aisle.” ‘When did we get to the point where we said, ‘No, we’re not going to talk to Democrats about a fix?’ We should be working with our colleagues on the other side of the aisle,’ Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, told NBC News Tuesday.” [NBC News, 6/27/17]

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): “We Must Work In A Bipartisan Way To Fix The ACA’s Serious Flaws.” “I voted no on motion to proceed. When dealing with a complex issue that affects millions of Americans and 1/6th of our economy, we must proceed carefully. Making sweeping changes to the 50-year-old Medicaid program without a single Senate hearing is a mistake. We must work in a bipartisan way to fix the ACA’s serious flaws.” [Collins Tweet, 7/25/17]

  • Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): “I Want To Work W/ My GOP & Dem Colleagues To Fix The Flaws In ACA.” “I want to work w/ my GOP & Dem colleagues to fix the flaws in ACA. CBO analysis shows Senate bill won’t do it.” [Collins Tweet, 6/26/17]
  • Sen. Susan Collins (R-Me): “Go Back To The Drawing Board” And Work With Democrats To “Correct” Problems In The ACA. [Bloomberg’s Sahil Kapur Tweet, 6/27/17]

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ): Writing Bill Behind Closed Doors And Forcing Passage Against A Unified Opposition Is Not “Going To Work In The End. And It Probably Shouldn’t.” “We’ve tried to do this by coming up with a proposal behind closed doors in consultation with the administration, then springing it on skeptical members, trying to convince them it’s better than nothing, asking us to swallow our doubts and force it past a unified opposition. I don’t think that is going to work in the end. And it probably shouldn’t.” [Sen. McCain Remarks, 7/25/17]

  • Sen. John McCain (R-AZ): Sen. McCain Calls For Return To Regular Order, Including “Input From Members Of Both Parties.” “The Congress must now return to regular order, hold hearings, receive input from members of both parties, and heed the recommendations of our nation’s governors so that we can produce a bill that finally provides Americans with access to quality and affordable health care.” [Sen. McCain Statement, 7/17/17]

Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV): “Republicans And Democrats Should Sit Down Together.” [Ralston Tweet, 6/27/17]

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA): “I Wish We Weren’t Doing It One Party.” “Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said in an interview broadcast on Sunday that he wants the healthcare bill to be negotiated with both parties. ‘I wish we weren’t doing it one party. But that said, if you can lower premiums, that is common ground,’ Cassidy said on NBC’s ‘Meet The Press.’” [The Hill, 7/2/17]

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV): “Collaborating With Democrats On The Other Side, To Me, Is Not An Exercise In Futility.” “‘Collaborating with Democrats on the other side, to me, is not an exercise in futility,’ Capito said, noting that she has spoken with Manchin and other Democrats about tackling health care together. ‘That may be where we end up, and so be it.’” [Politico, 7/9/17]

  • Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV): “It’s Never Good To Pass Major Legislation Without The Input Of Both Parties.” “It’s hard for me to see how we get there. I think a better approach would be to try to involve some moderate Democrats in the process and see if we can come up with a bipartisan bill. It’s never good to pass major legislation without the input of both parties.” [The Hill, 6/28/17]

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI): “I Wish We Were Doing This On A Bipartisan Basis.” “‘I wish we were doing this on a bipartisan basis,’ Johnson told CNN’s Chris Cuomo on “New Day.” ‘I think it was a mistake saying right away we were going to do this partisan, that’s where we’re out. Maybe what we’re going to have to do is our partisan bill, Democrats do theirs, we’re not going to fix all of these problems. Then maybe, maybe everybody will sit down and lets long-term fix the healthcare system, let’s start controlling healthcare costs,’ the Wisconsin senator continued.” [The Hill, 6/28/17]

Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA): “We’ve Got To Come Together, Republicans And Democrats And Deal With The Issues That Are Making Health Insurance So Expensive.” “The Affordable Care Act is the law of the land. As said by the majority leader and the minority leader Thursday night or Friday morning, neither party did anything to fix it. We’ve still got some things that need to be done. We’ve got to come together, Republicans and Democrats and deal with the issues that are making insurance so expensive. I think we will, and I think we’ll eventually get it done.” [Isakson Interview with Marietta Journal editorial staff, 8/1/17]

Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY): “For Big Things That Affect The Country, It Should Be Done In A Bipartisan Way.” “As lawmakers in Washington remain divided over the future of health care in the United States, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyoming, says there should be a bipartisan approach when it comes to legislation. ‘Should have been bipartisan when Obamacare was passed. It should be now as well,’ Barrasso said Sunday on ‘Face the Nation.’ ‘For big things that affect the country, it should be done in a bipartisan way,’ he added.” [CBS Face the Nation, 7/23/17]

Republicans: Graham-Cassidy-Heller Repeal Bill Dead in the Senate

Now Republicans Must Stop Trump’s Sabotage by Ensuring Cost Sharing Reduction Payments Are Made or Hold the Bag for Skyrocketing Premiums

Before it has even been introduced, the latest desperate attempt at health care repeal from Republicans is dead on arrival according to Republican Senators. The repeal proposal from Senators Graham, Cassidy and Heller was the most vicious bill yet and can’t seem to get the support from members of their own party. Sen. Hatch gave the possibility of a vote on the bill a firm, “No” on Monday. Sen. Rand Paul said the bill “sounds to me like a bad idea.” The bill proposes the same deeply unpopular provisions of previous repeal bills, including deep cuts to Medicaid, ending federal funding for Medicaid Expansion states, eliminating payments to help lower out-of-pocket costs and deductibles for lower-income individuals, and increasing out-of-pocket costs for people with pre-existing conditions. The bill would also disproportionately hurt states that expanded Medicaid over states that did not.

“The now dead Graham-Cassidy-Heller bill would have been the worst of all the partisan health care bills Senate Republicans have pursued to date — worse even than those that were already soundly rejected by the American people,” said Protect Our Care Campaign Director Brad Woodhouse. “Now is the time for Republicans to finally abandon these failed, partisan repeal efforts and work toward bipartisan solutions to improve health care like immediately making good on the cost-sharing reduction payments to prevent premiums from skyrocketing for Americans by twenty percent and provide much-needed certainty to the health care market. If Republicans don’t quickly stand up to Trump’s sabotage and ensure these payments are made, they will be to blame when the premiums rise, coverage lapses occur and the debt explodes by $200 billion.”

Current GOP Repeal Bill is Worst GOP Repeal Bill Yet

~The GOP Repeal Bill Would Cut Coverage, Raise Costs and Eliminate Protections~

With 3 weeks until the clock runs out on the GOP’s ability to repeal health care through partisan repeal, Republicans are scheming to ram through another secretly drafted plan — but this one might be their worst one yet. Senators have repeatedly promised an open process with “regular order” to allow for expert testimony, debate and amendments before passing a health care repeal, but this scheme was drafted in secret and may be rammed through at the last minute. In fact, Ohio Republican Governor John Kasich said last week that he opposes this plan, calling it an “eleventh hour” attempt at repeal, and in a bipartisan Senate hearing Massachusetts Republican Governor Charlie Baker said the plan would result in “dramatically negative” effects in his state.

Reports about the plan, known as Graham-Cassidy-Heller, suggest that it will include the same draconian cuts to Medicaid as the Senate’s previously introduced Better Care Reconciliation Act by eliminating the enhanced federal funding for the ACA’s Medicaid expansion and turning the remaining program into a block grant. But Graham-Cassidy-Heller would also eliminate the ACA’s marketplace subsidies. In their place, the proposal would give states a block grant that would shrink over time, ending entirely by 2027.


Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 8/24/17

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has shown that every health care repeal means cutting coverage, increasing costs and gutting protections that people depend on. This is no different. In fact, Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins said she has “a lot of problems” with the way this plan guts Medicaid, and Nevada Republican Governor Brian Sandoval said he has “a problem” with the cuts to health insurance in Nevada.

“Anyone who thinks Republicans have been listening to voters who hated the first 5 health care repeal attempts is sorely mistaken — this latest scheme is even worse,” said Protect Our Care Campaign Director Brad Woodhouse. “Republicans are putting politics over people’s health care and are rushing through this partisan, harmful repeal bill in the final 3 weeks. Doing this puts in jeopardy the bipartisan, open process that’s begun in Senate Health Committee to strengthen our health care system.”

The American people have overwhelmingly rejected health care repeal time and again. In the latest polling from Hart Research released last week, voters have gone from neutral on health care repeal in March of 2017 (45% favor, 48% unfavor) to overwhelmingly opposed in the latest polling (25% favor, 60% unfavor). In fact, an analysis by MIT found the GOP effort to repeal health care to be the most unpopular legislation in 30 years.

KEY FACTS ABOUT GRAHAM-CASSIDY-HELLER

  1. Includes the same cuts to Medicaid And Medicaid Expansion As Other Repeal Bills. This repeal scheme embrace the already-rejected Medicaid cuts in the Senate’s failed health care repeal bill (known as BCRA) with $180 billion in cuts over 10 years — gutting Medicaid coverage for seniors in nursing homes and kids with disabilities. In addition, this would effectively eliminate Medicaid expansion by 2027. [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 8/24/17]
  2. Increases Out Of Pocket Costs And Weakens Protections For People With Pre-existing Conditions. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found, “The proposal includes provisions of the Senate Republican leadership bill that would allow states to waive important consumer protections in the individual market. Under these waivers, which would be subject to near-automatic approval by the federal government, insurers could exclude crucial services such as maternity and mental health care from their plans, impose annual and lifetime limits, and dramatically raise deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs. According to CBO, states with about half of the population would take up these damaging waivers. In addition, Senators Cassidy and Graham are reportedly also considering adding to their plan the so-called ‘Cruz amendment,’ which would allow insurers to charge sharply higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions or deny them coverage altogether.” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 8/24/17]
  3. Allows Insurers To Charge Older People Up To Five Times More For Coverage As Younger People. [Kaiser Family Foundation, 8/1/17]
  4. Reduces And Eventually Eliminates Federal Funding For Tax Credits That Help People Afford Coverage. “Under current law, moderate-income individual market consumers are guaranteed tax credits to help them pay for meaningful coverage meeting certain standards, and low-income adults in expansion states are guaranteed the ability to enroll in Medicaid, which ensures a comprehensive array of benefits and financial protection. The Cassidy-Graham amendment would eliminate these guarantees and allow states to spend their federal funding on virtually any health care purpose. Faced with large federal funding cuts and exposed to enormous risk, most if not all states would be forced to use this ‘flexibility’ to eliminate or cut coverage and financial assistance for low- and moderate-income people.” [Center on Budget And Policy Priorities, 7/27/17]

Protect Our Care Statement on Today’s Senate HELP Committee Hearing on Market Stabilization

Washington, D.C. — Protect Our Care Campaign Director Brad Woodhouse released the following statement in reaction to today’s Senate HELP Committee hearing on the health care marketplace:

“First and foremost, today’s hearing was a notable and welcome departure from the secretive, partisan and ultimately failed repeal effort which President Trump and Senate and House Republicans pursued for the first half of this year,” said Woodhouse. “The mere fact that these hearings are occurring and that bipartisan approaches to market stabilization are being discussed should send a strong signal to the partisan repeal holdouts that it is time to set aside that approach and instead work together to ensure more and more Americans have access to reliable, affordable care. It should also send an unmistakable signal to President Trump that his strategy to sabotage the law is wrong headed and faces bipartisan opposition.

“Substantively, there was broad agreement that Congress must ensure that cost sharing reduction payments continue to be made to lower out of pocket costs for millions of low-income Americans. Every insurance commissioner who testified agreed that ensuring these payments are made must be part of any stabilization plan and nearly all Senators on the panel agreed with that notion. As we have said before, these payments are an essential feature of the health care law, President Trump has been wrong to sow uncertainty in the market by threatening not to pay them and ensuring they continue is among the most important features of any stabilization bill. That there was broad agreement by the panel and the witnesses on the importance of these payments to make health care more affordable for millions of Americans was a welcome sign to say the least.”

What Will The Senate GOP Do on Health Care: Bipartisan Solutions or Partisan Repeal as Trump…

According to news reports this morning, President Trump is again demanding that Congress deliver on health care repeal, despite the fact that it’s been overwhelmingly rejected by voters and repeated analysis has shown it would cut coverage, increase costs and eliminate protections. The latest vehicle for partisan repeal appears to be the so called Graham-Cassidy-Heller bill, which represents another partisan, secretive repeal effort which will gut coverage, slash Medicaid, raise out-of-pocket costs and weaken or eliminate protections for people with pre-existing conditions.

Senate Republicans have a choice to make: do they embrace the bipartisan committee hearings beginning today that focus on improving our health care system, reducing costs and stabilizing the markets OR do they follow Trump’s demand for another hyper-partisan health care repeal?

OPTION 1: POLITICO: “Trump wants one last Senate push on Obamacare repeal”

OPTION 2: Washington Post: “Senate panel begins bipartisan hearings to try to improve Affordable Care Act”

“The reality is clear: voters have rejected health care repeal because it guts our health care system, rips away coverage and raises costs. Graham-Cassidy-Heller is more of the same,” said Protect Our Care Campaign Director Brad Woodhouse. “Congress should listen to their constituents and reject the secret, partisan road to repeal. The American people expect Congress to work across the aisle and improve our health care system, not succumb to President Trump’s demands for a health care repeal.”

4 FACTS About The Latest Health Care Repeal Ploy (Graham-Cassidy-Heller)

I UNPOPULAR. New polling shows 60% of people oppose the GOP’s health care repeal bills while only 25% support it. That’s down from 48% unfavorable, 45% favorable back in March. The GOP health care repeal effort is the most unpopular legislation in over 30 years according to an analysis by MIT professors.

II SECRET. Despite commitments to oppose secretive processes on health care, the proposal still has had No public legislative language, section-by-section analysis or meaningful description; No public Congressional Budget Office estimates; No apparent consultation with experts; and No apparent inclusion of women Senators in the process.

III HARMFUL. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found the plan would “cause many millions of people to lose coverage, radically restructure and deeply cut Medicaid, increase out-of-pocket costs for individual market consumers, and weaken or eliminate protections for people with pre-existing conditions.”

IV WORSE. The latest analysis found this plan would be worse than the already-rejected health care repeal bills. Vox reports it would be “arguably be more disruptive, not less, to the current health care system. It would let money currently spent on health insurance go toward other programs, providing no guarantee that the Affordable Care Act programs individuals rely on today would continue into the future.”